Republicans in Congress cannot use a dark legislative maneuver to stop the California ban to sell new car -powered cars by 2035, the Senate MP decided on Friday.
The decision faced a blow to Trump’s management efforts to quickly kill policies that promote electric vehicles.
California had received a federal resignation since 1970 Clean Air Act from Biden’s administration to impose a stricter car emission standard than the federal government. Under this resignation, he established a plan to demand all new cars sold in the state by 2035 to get rid of greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide, the primary contribution to climate change.
It is one of the most ambitious climate policies in the United States, designed to shift the automotive industry to electric cars. This has made the top goal of eliminating Trump’s administration.
However, according to three Democrats in the Senate, the MP said on Friday that the resignation granted to California is not subject to the Congress review law, which allows legislators to reverse recently activated regulations by simple majority.
The two Democratic Senators of California, Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff and Rhodes Island’s Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the leading Democrat in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, announced the decision, but refused to liberate the text.
All three described it as a victory for climate policies.
“When crossing the fresh air law on an overwhelming bilateral basis, Congress has explicitly granted California the opportunity to set stricter vehicle emissions to protect public health from the unique California air quality challenges,” Mr Padilla said.
“This last trick from Trump’s EPA was a clearly false attempt to underestimate the leadership of the California climate and failed,” he said.
Trump’s management submitted the carbon exemption from the car industry in Congress, along with two other California exemptions approved by the environmental protection service last year. One requires that half of all new heavy duty vehicles sold in the state is electric by 2035 and the other parts of nitrogen dioxide and particle emissions from cars and trucks.
MP Elizabeth MacDonough is a civil servant acting as a referee and inspector of the Senate rules. He decided that the rules would not allow Republicans to accelerate the abolition of resignation.
Mr Schiff noted that the MP was “non -profit and independent” and added that California “was the golden model to combat harmful air pollution and today’s decision allows the struggle to continue.”
In a statement, California’s Governor Gavin Newsom said: “For decades, California has used the power given to us by Congress and President Nixon to determine the global clean car and our trucks promoting our communities,
The pure air law stipulates that California may be allowed to establish stricter standard of fresh air than those defined by the federal government because, historically, it had the most contaminated air in the nation. Federal law also allows other states to adopt California’s standards as their own, under certain circumstances.
As the fifth largest economy in the world, California has a significant influence on the market. Eleven other states said they would follow the lead of California and ban the sale of new gas cars by 2035. Together, they are almost half of the United States car market.
Republicans had made the assumption that because of California’s economic influence, car exemption put a de facto national policy that should be treated as a regulation. However, two decisions by the Government Bureau, the Congress’s arm, found differently. California has received hundreds of exemptions over the years and no one has been presented in Congress for voting.
Senator Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican of Western Virginia, who led the attempt to abolish the resignation from California, did not immediately respond to commentary request. A spokesman for Senator John Thune, the majority leader, also did not respond to a request.
Thomas J. Pyle, president of the American energy alliance, who supports the fossil fuel industry, argued that legislators have the power to consider “regardless of what the MP is thinking”. Mr Pyle said the decision “should not stop the Republicans from moving forward.
Legislators have bypassed the Senate MP before. In fact, Republicans reported this week that they could try to work around a decision to pass a separate budget and a tax bill through the Chamber.
The body could still vote to overthrow exemptions and put pressure on the Senate to act. This week, Republican legislators led by California’s Kevin Kiley spokesman introduced resolutions to overthrow California’s three exemptions. But they don’t have much time to act. The law gives Congress 60 days from the day a rule entered into force to pass a resolution that canceled it and the Biden administration approved the resignation in December.
“The irrational plan of the Newsom administration to ban cars and trucks powered by gas is an insult to the freedom of the Californians and a financial burden across the country,” Mr Kiley said in a statement.
If Republicans in the Senate chose to adhere to the MP’s decision, the options for the quick murder of California’s policy are limited. Lee Zeldin, the EPA administrator, could withdraw resignation, but this would require months of public alert and commentary.
Molly Vaseliou, a spokesman for EPA, did not comment on the organization’s plans, but criticized California as imposing “ongoing, expensive and unnecessary regulations”. He said when the organization was broadcast in Congress, EPA “fulfilled its obligations”.
Laurel Rosenhall References from California contribute.
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish